X
Clinical Adjudication Process

By Ethical 17 Nov, 2020

Clinical Endpoint Adjudication Process: The 30,000ft View

The clinical endpoint adjudication process can be quite complex. The very reason why a clinical team decides to adjudicate one or more endpoints is indeed that they are complex and difficult for investigators to decode upon. Carefully planning every step and setting up the proper tools are therefore paramount to the success of the endeavor. Here’s a high-level view.

Endpoint Adjudication Process

 4 Phases of a Clinical Endpoint Adjudication Process

The clinical adjudication process is decided and piloted by the clinical team but needs input and help from several other teams such as operations, data management and IT. Once the decision is made to adjudicate one or more clinical endpoints, the process can begin.

Phase 1: Study Preparation

During the protocol development phase, study objectives and endpoints are defined and the precise events that will need to be adjudicated are selected. It is important to define what triggers an adjudication case (e.g. an adverse event, a particular outcome, a pre-defined assessment value…). The necessary data and records for reviewers’ assessment must be defined, adjudication forms created, and EAC members selected. Finally, timelines and workflows need to be drawn and all the above must be described in the Adjudication Charter which will be signed by all parties.

Phase 2: Software Configuration and Study start-up

Not all clinical adjudication studies will use a dedicated software platform, but if you do, now is the time to configure it. A number of technical steps and agreements will take place here, the key document being the Users’ Requirements Specifications (URS) which describes the software functionalities. Integrations and imports as well as data exports will be organized. Tests will be performed in the validation environment and finally the study moved in production in time for the study-start up.

Phase 3: Events processing

Once the study has begun and events that need adjudication start emerging, the process kicks in. Medical records and data are collected, compiled, anonymized and presented to the EAC members in a standardized, pre-agreed format. Cross checking and disagreement resolution are vital steps to ensure quality and consistency - these are not easy cases and the assessment requires high expertise. The endpoint adjudication office will monitor KPIs for efficiency and quality and may need to adjust the clinical adjudication process. Final opinions will be recorded in the study results and may define the overall outcome. A compliant software incorporates full, independent audit trail recording for audit purposes.

Phase 4: Study close-out

Lastly, at study close-out, a database quality control (QC) needs to be performed to verify for errors and misplacements and the final set of data will be transferred to the sponsor’s servers and archived for future verifications.

For more information about Clinical Endpoint Adjudication Process or Endpoint Adjudication in general, grab a free copy of Adjudication Handbook below:

DOWNLOAD NOW THE FREE ENDPOINT ADJUDICATION HANDBOOK
The Complete Manual / Reference Book (34 pages) with all the topics related to the Independent Endpoint Adjudication Committees Management

Archives

Tags

Download Ethical eAdjudication for Endpoint Adjudication Dossier

eAdjudication®
Solution Description

DOWNLOAD NOW

Request a Demo of the eAdjudication® Software Solution

We are EU-GDPR compliant: Your Data will never be used improperly



Event Adjudication Charter Guide

Event Adjudication
Charter Guidebook
Free Download

DOWNLOAD ↓
Previous Next

Clinical Trial Endpoint Adjudication: Roles and Responsibilities

linical research professionals are manning the adjudication systems and specific SOPs govern the whole process. Here are the main roles and their respective responsibilities.

Roles in Endpoint AdjudicationREAD MORE

Matching Changes in trial processes: It is not a freefall

Fine-tuning during the conduct of a clinical trial may lead to changes in some of the parameters. Adjusting the Endpoint Adjudication Database in time ensures a smooth monitoring and supports data quality.

Matching Changes in trial processes - It is not a freefallMatching Changes in Trial Processes

CEC Adjudication and FDA: Regulators, what do they think?

he FDA agency has rarely mentioned the topic in their numerous guidelines. We all know that FDA language uses recommendation rather than obligation even incases of strong requirement. CEC Endpoint adjudication is no exception to that rule.

CEC Adjudication: Regulators, what do they think? #1: FDAREAD MORE